No Verdict in Penny Trial As Jury Asks To Re-Hear Charges

Daniel Penny Trial: A Closer Look at Key Evidence and Legal Battles

The trial of Daniel Penny, a former Marine accused of manslaughter, has captivated public attention. The case involves the tragic death of Jordan Neely, a homeless man and Michael Jackson impersonator, who died on a New York subway after being held in a chokehold by Penny. While the jury continues deliberating, they have requested to review crucial evidence and definitions related to the charges. Adding to the case’s complexity, Neely’s father has filed a civil lawsuit against Penny, seeking monetary damages.

Jury Examines Critical Video Evidence

On Thursday, the jury asked to re-watch two key videos from the incident. The first video, recorded by journalist Alberto Vazquez, shows Penny restraining Neely in a chokehold for around six minutes. This footage is central to the case, as it captures Neely initially struggling and then going limp. When police arrived, Neely was unresponsive and later pronounced dead at a hospital.

The second video, taken by high school student Ivette Rosario, provides a different perspective. Rosario testified that Neely entered the subway car shouting about his hunger and thirst, which frightened her. She began filming after the train stopped, capturing the chaotic scene. In her video, Penny can be seen holding Neely down while another passenger is heard asking him to release Neely.

The jury’s request to review these videos reflects their need to analyze the evidence closely. They also sought clarification on legal definitions, particularly the terms “recklessness” and “negligence,” which are crucial in determining Penny’s guilt.

Understanding the Legal Charges

The jury must decide if Penny’s actions meet the criteria for second-degree manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide. According to Judge Maxwell Wiley, second-degree manslaughter involves recklessly causing another person’s death. Recklessness means being aware of a substantial risk of death but proceeding with the action anyway.

Prosecutors argue that Penny, trained as a Marine, should have known the dangers of a chokehold. They believe his actions created a significant risk of death. The defense, however, claims that Penny’s chokehold did not directly cause Neely’s death and that other factors may have played a role.

If the jury considers Penny’s actions as less intentional, they may focus on the lesser charge of criminally negligent homicide. This charge applies if Penny failed to realize the risk his actions posed. The penalties for these charges vary, with manslaughter carrying up to 15 years in prison and negligent homicide up to four years. The judge could also impose probation instead of jail time.

The Tragic Case: Navy Sailor’s Family Sues Virginian-Pilot for $60 Million

Civil Lawsuit Adds a New Dimension

While the criminal trial continues, Neely’s father, Andre Zachery, has filed a civil lawsuit against Penny. This lawsuit seeks financial compensation for Neely’s death, regardless of the criminal trial’s outcome. Civil cases like this operate separately from criminal proceedings, meaning Penny could face monetary penalties even if he is acquitted of the criminal charges.

Neely’s tragic life adds an emotional layer to the case. His mother was murdered in 2007, and reports suggest his relationship with his father was strained. Despite these complexities, the civil lawsuit highlights the enduring impact of Neely’s death on his family.

Public Awaits the Verdict

As the jury deliberates, their understanding of the evidence and legal definitions will shape the trial’s outcome. The case raises questions about accountability, self-defense, and the use of force, making it a subject of widespread discussion.

The trial is set to resume on Friday morning, with the public and media closely following every development. Whether through criminal or civil court, the pursuit of justice for Jordan Neely continues to unfold, leaving a lasting impact on all involved.